Off topic: Feline matters
- פותח הנושא ayalonav
- פורסם בתאריך
דר קרן תורגמן
New member
איזה מזל שהוספת את הפרט החשוב הזה
עמדתי לתת לחתול שלי כדור וואליום
. סתאאאם... מה קרה לך, יצאת מההיברנציה שלך? יש חשדות?
עמדתי לתת לחתול שלי כדור וואליום
דר קרן תורגמן
New member
איזו מהן? יש כל כך הרבה!
דר קרן תורגמן
New member
עכשיו הבנתי שזאת הייתה שאלה
לרגע חשבתי שקראת לי מאמי.. מההיברנציה. תרדמת חורף.
לרגע חשבתי שקראת לי מאמי.. מההיברנציה. תרדמת חורף.
דר קרן תורגמן
New member
אבי, חששותיי רבים
ידידי, האם אתה בקו הבריאות? דבריך תמוהים, שלא לדבר על הלינקים שהינך מצרף להודעות התמוהות שלך. זה השפעת הפרוויג'יל?
ידידי, האם אתה בקו הבריאות? דבריך תמוהים, שלא לדבר על הלינקים שהינך מצרף להודעות התמוהות שלך. זה השפעת הפרוויג'יל?
דוקטור, לקח לך קצת זמן להבין
שההודעה הקודמת היתה שאלה. יקח עוד קצת זמן ותביני גם את שאר דברי
חוץ מזה מה לא בסדר בלינקים? DEAD RECKONING "Increased Risk of Death in Patients With Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders," L.B. Shepardson, S.J. Youngner, T. Speroff and G.E. Rosenthal, Medical Care, vol. 37, no. 8, August 1999, pp. 727-37.
שההודעה הקודמת היתה שאלה. יקח עוד קצת זמן ותביני גם את שאר דברי
דר קרן תורגמן
New member
גדול, היה באמת מאמר כזה!
אתה צודק, אני קשת הבנה לפעמים.
אתה צודק, אני קשת הבנה לפעמים.
דר קרן תורגמן
New member
? ולא !
דר קרן תורגמן
New member
זה לא מצחיק
קראתי את התקציר, האמת היא שזה רציני. העובדה שהייתה הוראה כזו הביאה לתמותה גבוהה יותר עבור חומרה מקבילה של גורמי סיכון. נכון שהכותרת היא מעין oxymoron, יכול הליות שהיו יכולים לנסח אותה טוב יותר, אבל זה בעצם רציני. אבל תמשיך לספק פנינים, זה בהחלט משעשע.
קראתי את התקציר, האמת היא שזה רציני. העובדה שהייתה הוראה כזו הביאה לתמותה גבוהה יותר עבור חומרה מקבילה של גורמי סיכון. נכון שהכותרת היא מעין oxymoron, יכול הליות שהיו יכולים לנסח אותה טוב יותר, אבל זה בעצם רציני. אבל תמשיך לספק פנינים, זה בהחלט משעשע.
דר קרן תורגמן
New member
שרות לאומה
אבי, מאחר ואני מסופקת אם יש לך גישה לטקסט המלא של המאמר החשוב הזה, החלטתי להטיב איתך ועם שאר חברינו בפורום ולהגיש לך אותו , תוך infringement מוחלט ובוטה של זכויות יוצרים. קראיה מהנה!
אבי, מאחר ואני מסופקת אם יש לך גישה לטקסט המלא של המאמר החשוב הזה, החלטתי להטיב איתך ועם שאר חברינו בפורום ולהגיש לך אותו , תוך infringement מוחלט ובוטה של זכויות יוצרים. קראיה מהנה!
ואחרון חביב, double
עוד סיבות למה לא לחייב רופאים להופיע מעונבים בעבודה: “Multicentre Randomised Double Bind Crossover Trial on Contamination of Conventional Ties and Bow Ties in Routine Obstetric and Gynaecological Practice,” M.M. Biljan, C.A. Hart, D. Sunderland, P.R. Manasse, and C.R. Kingsland, British Medical Journal, vol. 307, no. 6919, December 18-25, 1993, pp. 1582-4. Although bow ties were significantly less contaminated at end of first working day (z = -2.354, p = 0.019), this difference was not maintained; there was no difference in level of contamination on third day. “Neck Ties as Vectors for Nosocomial Infection,” M. Dixon, Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 26, no. 2, February 2000, p. 250. The results suggest that neck ties should be considered a significant potential source of infection. Although this risk can be lessened by wearing plastic aprons when we come into contact with patients maybe we should do without neck ties altogether in critical care areas.
עוד סיבות למה לא לחייב רופאים להופיע מעונבים בעבודה: “Multicentre Randomised Double Bind Crossover Trial on Contamination of Conventional Ties and Bow Ties in Routine Obstetric and Gynaecological Practice,” M.M. Biljan, C.A. Hart, D. Sunderland, P.R. Manasse, and C.R. Kingsland, British Medical Journal, vol. 307, no. 6919, December 18-25, 1993, pp. 1582-4. Although bow ties were significantly less contaminated at end of first working day (z = -2.354, p = 0.019), this difference was not maintained; there was no difference in level of contamination on third day. “Neck Ties as Vectors for Nosocomial Infection,” M. Dixon, Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 26, no. 2, February 2000, p. 250. The results suggest that neck ties should be considered a significant potential source of infection. Although this risk can be lessened by wearing plastic aprons when we come into contact with patients maybe we should do without neck ties altogether in critical care areas.
דר קרן תורגמן
New member
אני נשבעת שלא אופיע יותר לעבודה
עם עניבה. זה קלאסה, אבל פשוט מסוכן מדי. אזשמו כן הוא, כאב (לפי שמו של העיתון) שמפוצץ לך את הראש. אבל לא כך... האמת שעניבות הפרפר האלה תמיד הדהימו אותי כשהגעתי לארה"ב. מעניין מתי מתחילים עם זה. בארץ, לא הרחיקו לכת עד כדי כך, אבל ב-15 שנים האחרונות יותר ויותר רופאים נכנסו לקטע של העניבה. והאמת? זה די פתטי. לאמריקאים זה בא כל כך בטבעיות, אבל פה, מה אגיד לך. מזל, שאנחנו, הנשים, לא היינו צריכות להמודד עם דילמה כזו. יש לך משהו פחות רפואי?
עם עניבה. זה קלאסה, אבל פשוט מסוכן מדי. אזשמו כן הוא, כאב (לפי שמו של העיתון) שמפוצץ לך את הראש. אבל לא כך... האמת שעניבות הפרפר האלה תמיד הדהימו אותי כשהגעתי לארה"ב. מעניין מתי מתחילים עם זה. בארץ, לא הרחיקו לכת עד כדי כך, אבל ב-15 שנים האחרונות יותר ויותר רופאים נכנסו לקטע של העניבה. והאמת? זה די פתטי. לאמריקאים זה בא כל כך בטבעיות, אבל פה, מה אגיד לך. מזל, שאנחנו, הנשים, לא היינו צריכות להמודד עם דילמה כזו. יש לך משהו פחות רפואי?
Which Came First — The Chicken Or t
The question has a reputation for being difficult, perhaps even impossible, to answer. Philosophers treat it as a conundrum. But in the hands of an experimental scientist, the question is simple and straightforward, and the answer is easily obtained. I doubt that I am the first to solve the chicken-and-egg problem, but a search of the scientific literature How the Problem was Solved Figure 1. The 1993 USPS regulations for mailing adult chickens. The more recent version is substantially the same, but does not feature the clear sub-section heading “Mailability of Adult Chickens.” Which came first — the chicken of the egg? I tackled the question experimentally, using a chicken, an egg, and the United States Postal Service (USPS). I mailed the chicken and the egg, each in its own separate packaging, and The Chicken In mailing the chicken, I was careful to adhere to the restrictions described in the Postal Service’s Domestic Mail Manual [DMM] 57, as updated in Postal Bulletin [PB] 2209, April 3, 2003. (See Figure 1.) This, the most recent, version of the DMM states that: "Adult chickens must be sent by Express Mail. The Express Mail containers used must pass the standards in International Safe Transit Association (ISTA) Test Procedure 1A (detailed in Publication 2, Packaging for Mailing); be designed to remain intact during normal handling; be constructed to totally confine the chickens; contain shavings or other material to prevent damage to the bottom of the container; and be ventilated properly to ensure humane treatment in transit. The number of birds in each parcel must not exceed the container manufacturer’s limit." I mailed the chicken in a crate obtained from a colleague who does research with poultry at a midwestern university. Details are available on request, for anyone who wishes to replicate this experiment. The Egg I mailed the egg in standard packaging obtained through an industrial supplier. Details are available on request, for anyone who wishes to replicate this experiment. Bon Voyage I mailed both the chicken and the egg at 9:40 a.m., on a Monday morning, from the Harvard Square post office, in Cambridge. The staff there told me that this was the first chicken anyone had mailed from Harvard Square in recent memory, and perhaps ever. Nonetheless, the postal employees handled both the chicken and the egg deftly, with dispatch, and with courtesy. The intended destination for both packages was the James A. Farley General Post Office, which is located in Manhattan right next to the Penn Station train terminal. I took the subway from Harvard Square to the Boston train station, and from there boarded a train to New York City, a distance of approximately 200 miles, arriving that afternoon at Penn Station. I immediately went to the post office, to await the arrivals of the chicken and the egg. Results The James A. Farley General Post Office is open 24 hours a day, so I was able to wait there until both items arrived. I inquired once per hour for both the chicken and the egg. That day, Monday, neither the chicken nor the egg arrived. The next day, Tuesday, neither the chicken nor the egg arrived. The chicken arrived at 10:31 a.m. Wednesday. The staff at the post office told me that this was the first chicken anyone had mailed to the James A. Farley General Post Office in recent memory, and perhaps ever. The egg arrived that same day, at 9:37 p.m., eleven hours after the chicken. Conclusion It has now been empirically determined that the chicken came first, the egg second. However, seeing the history of previous questions that were taken up first by philosophers and only later by scientists, I am loath to predict that these results — clear as they are — will settle the question to everyone’s satisfaction.
The question has a reputation for being difficult, perhaps even impossible, to answer. Philosophers treat it as a conundrum. But in the hands of an experimental scientist, the question is simple and straightforward, and the answer is easily obtained. I doubt that I am the first to solve the chicken-and-egg problem, but a search of the scientific literature How the Problem was Solved Figure 1. The 1993 USPS regulations for mailing adult chickens. The more recent version is substantially the same, but does not feature the clear sub-section heading “Mailability of Adult Chickens.” Which came first — the chicken of the egg? I tackled the question experimentally, using a chicken, an egg, and the United States Postal Service (USPS). I mailed the chicken and the egg, each in its own separate packaging, and The Chicken In mailing the chicken, I was careful to adhere to the restrictions described in the Postal Service’s Domestic Mail Manual [DMM] 57, as updated in Postal Bulletin [PB] 2209, April 3, 2003. (See Figure 1.) This, the most recent, version of the DMM states that: "Adult chickens must be sent by Express Mail. The Express Mail containers used must pass the standards in International Safe Transit Association (ISTA) Test Procedure 1A (detailed in Publication 2, Packaging for Mailing); be designed to remain intact during normal handling; be constructed to totally confine the chickens; contain shavings or other material to prevent damage to the bottom of the container; and be ventilated properly to ensure humane treatment in transit. The number of birds in each parcel must not exceed the container manufacturer’s limit." I mailed the chicken in a crate obtained from a colleague who does research with poultry at a midwestern university. Details are available on request, for anyone who wishes to replicate this experiment. The Egg I mailed the egg in standard packaging obtained through an industrial supplier. Details are available on request, for anyone who wishes to replicate this experiment. Bon Voyage I mailed both the chicken and the egg at 9:40 a.m., on a Monday morning, from the Harvard Square post office, in Cambridge. The staff there told me that this was the first chicken anyone had mailed from Harvard Square in recent memory, and perhaps ever. Nonetheless, the postal employees handled both the chicken and the egg deftly, with dispatch, and with courtesy. The intended destination for both packages was the James A. Farley General Post Office, which is located in Manhattan right next to the Penn Station train terminal. I took the subway from Harvard Square to the Boston train station, and from there boarded a train to New York City, a distance of approximately 200 miles, arriving that afternoon at Penn Station. I immediately went to the post office, to await the arrivals of the chicken and the egg. Results The James A. Farley General Post Office is open 24 hours a day, so I was able to wait there until both items arrived. I inquired once per hour for both the chicken and the egg. That day, Monday, neither the chicken nor the egg arrived. The next day, Tuesday, neither the chicken nor the egg arrived. The chicken arrived at 10:31 a.m. Wednesday. The staff at the post office told me that this was the first chicken anyone had mailed to the James A. Farley General Post Office in recent memory, and perhaps ever. The egg arrived that same day, at 9:37 p.m., eleven hours after the chicken. Conclusion It has now been empirically determined that the chicken came first, the egg second. However, seeing the history of previous questions that were taken up first by philosophers and only later by scientists, I am loath to predict that these results — clear as they are — will settle the question to everyone’s satisfaction.
דר קרן תורגמן
New member
indeed, this needs to be repeated
אולי תנסה להגדיל את ה-N של הנסיוי הזה תוך ביצוע ניסון מקומי?
אולי תנסה להגדיל את ה-N של הנסיוי הזה תוך ביצוע ניסון מקומי?
Copyright©1996-2021,Tapuz Media Ltd. Forum software by XenForo® © 2010-2020 XenForo Ltd.