ליאורה 1212
New member
הבנת המפשט הבא -
שלום ,
אבקש עזרה בהנבת המשפט הבא -
Yet, the prima facie reason indicated by Insufficient Means Principle (IMP) is overridden by concerns of time
ממה שאני הבנתי זה :
ובכל זאת, הסיבה הלכאורה המצוינת על ידי עקרון האמצעי הבלתי מספק הוא נחלש על ידי דאגה של זמן.
מצרפת את הקטע שתוכלו להבין מההקשר -
Yet there is an important difference when it comes to the practical case. The consequent of (IMP) is not about what one should do, but rather about prima facie reasons. This is to account for special circumstances, such as when a decision to act is forced upon an agent. Suppose, for example, that it is extremely important that you be on time for a meeting, but you cannot remember whether it takes place on the second or the third floor. There is no way to find out the actual location, and you can only make it to one of these places in time. So you must choose between floors. Assume that you choose to go to the second floor, even though you have no reason to go there instead of the third floor. In such a scenario, you have reason to doubt that going to the second floor will be suitable for arriving at the meeting on time. Yet, the prima facie reason indicated by (IMP) is overridden by concerns of time
בתודה .
שלום ,
אבקש עזרה בהנבת המשפט הבא -
Yet, the prima facie reason indicated by Insufficient Means Principle (IMP) is overridden by concerns of time
ממה שאני הבנתי זה :
ובכל זאת, הסיבה הלכאורה המצוינת על ידי עקרון האמצעי הבלתי מספק הוא נחלש על ידי דאגה של זמן.
מצרפת את הקטע שתוכלו להבין מההקשר -
Yet there is an important difference when it comes to the practical case. The consequent of (IMP) is not about what one should do, but rather about prima facie reasons. This is to account for special circumstances, such as when a decision to act is forced upon an agent. Suppose, for example, that it is extremely important that you be on time for a meeting, but you cannot remember whether it takes place on the second or the third floor. There is no way to find out the actual location, and you can only make it to one of these places in time. So you must choose between floors. Assume that you choose to go to the second floor, even though you have no reason to go there instead of the third floor. In such a scenario, you have reason to doubt that going to the second floor will be suitable for arriving at the meeting on time. Yet, the prima facie reason indicated by (IMP) is overridden by concerns of time
בתודה .