the other way around
yea u got it the other way around. the modernism saw the world as is, and did not think there is a text or that the text has any importance or significance on the this as is. the pomo is the one that found the text and put it in the center making the world as is to be a fiction. as for whether there is something prior 2 the text. well, in modern time of course the world as can be grasped by humans, in pre-modern time of course as well probably God. in the pomo time, well according to Pitshon probably, according to others probably not. and the interpretation is not really ours, it is within the text and part of it, especially since we are part of it and we are texts ourselves. derida by the way does not try to maintain the text but to cripple it and to show how the text is necessarily and inherently cripple. pomo does not ry to maintain anything. it tries to cripple everything. that's y the thing u started this shirshur with is so wrong, and that's y the criticism the bitch had against pomo is not valid.